Matthew 28:18-20

[Reader Please Note, the Biblical injunction speaks to nations. Reference to Atomized Individuals is conspicuously absent, and that even though each individual is to stand alone before the Judgement Seat of God. It is perhaps a separate question whether the Divine reference to nations might, in the XXI century and earlier, rather more be understood as corresponding approximately to our states or provinces or Bundesländer or областях or Województwo, than to today's nationalistic nation-states, often quite contrived in origin, and consisting of 82 and of 320 million souls. Might the focus be on Texas and Saxony, not on the United States of America or the nation-state of Germany? Church authorities do emphasize Subsidiarity as a foundational principle of Christian civilization.]

Mark 16:15

Luke 24:46-47

from Douaumont, Verdun

Very good. But surely there is one detail we can do better ...
then we can talk about why civilization matters and geography does not.

– Relationship of United European Christendom, the proposition, the concept, to One World Government –

Executive Summary: None at all. They are antithetical concepts, as United European Christendom is antithetical to the quasi-Bilderberg Group/Trilateral Commission/Council on Foreign Relations, Plutarchy and the related New World Order-type Cabal. Likewise is United European Christendom antithetical to the absurd conspiracy theories advanced by atheists to counter the just mentioned.

Unity, without vital subsidiarity, would not be a good thing. Indeed it would almost certainly morph swiftly into something grotesque. Of course there can be only one true faith. Faith in error is not of value. One World Government can come, we can pray that it does come, under God with the Parousia, the Second Coming of Christ Jesus. Until then, forget it!

Here is as fine an example as the present writer has come across of a recent writing, published in 2000, favoring One World Government. It is excerpted here from page 281 of Reflections on a Ravaged Century, by Robert Conquest. Born in 1917 and still living as of this late February 2014 writing, he has been described as the greatest living historian, as indeed his contributions in other areas of scholarship have been huge. Rest assured, these paragraphs are reproduced here as a warning and certainly not with approbation.

"Evolution to a united and peaceful world is not something that can be undertaken in an abstract way. Those like H.G. Wells, who simply advocated a World State, seemed to imagine that the mere concept was so obviously demanded by progress and efficiency that intelligent people everywhere would accept it and then, in one way or another, impose it.

"The natural evolution would be, as we have said, a progressive united of the traditional civic cultures, attracting to that established center cultures less similar but converging in their direction, and finally cultures initially alien but, over a longer or shorter period, evolving their own forms of civic order.

"Generally speaking, closer integration of the (in the main) English-speaking countries, can create a center of power attractive to the other countries with a democratic tradition and form the basis for a yet broader political unity in the longer run. And this in turn could eventually be the foundation for a full unity of a democratized world.

"For from the point of view of the world at large, we can view a greater Association both in the short and in the long term. In the short term in defining political civilization, in opening a great part of the world to joint solutions of economic and social problems; and in the long term in securing world peace, transforming the politically backward areas, and creating the conditions for a genuine world community.

"A unity of the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand would itself be a viable hyperpower and, if no more could be done in the first phase, would suffice for a start. But it is to be hoped that all, or as many as possible, of the other countries having partially or entirely the same system might again conjoin at a more fruitful level."

Αγίων Κυρίλλος και Μεθοδίος - Святых Кирилла и Мефодия
Saints Cyril and Methodius, Patron Saints of Europe, Church in Thessaloniki

... on the shores of the Aegean, Thessaloniki, Bulgarian thanks to SS. Cyril and Methodius.

The notion and the practice that the central government within the nation-state reigns supreme, while states or provinces or Bundesländer or областях or Województwo, as the case may be, are in essence little more than administrative units of that central government, are relatively recent and absolutely bad. From the perspective of theology and ecclesiology, nationalism is the bane of orthodoxy and of Orthodoxy. All learned and pious believers agree on this. Even from a secular perspective, nationalism has poorly served the constituent peoples of European Christendom (and all the other civilizations of the world for that matter) in their dealings with each other — "international relations" — as it has poorly served them domestically. Most of those decisions and functions in life not properly left to the individual and to the family should be made at the regional level, the level roughly corresponding to the current states in Australia and in the United States of America, the Canadian and French and Argentinian provinces, the Russian областей, the German Bundesländer, and so forth, though of course countries such as Scotland and Serbia already approximate such scale. To be sure, the defence and intelligence and security forces within UEC should be organized and lead at the UEC level. Obviously all the inhabitants of UEC would benefit from standardization in commercial, trade and other similar legistation and regulatory frameworks and agencies, though by this notion of standardization less government, not more, is meant. More bureaucratic Bonapartes in Brussels, or elsewhere, is decidedly not a goal. Beyond that it is difficult to see how the national aglomerations serve the people of European Christendom at all. Encouraging us to go, fostering our going, to war with one another, European Christians killing each other, is not a service.

Civilizational strivings should be aimed toward fostering in all peoples their right and proper destiny of longing for nearness to God. Reasserting the Christianity of European Christendom can be and ultimately must be harmonious with the evangelization and Christian understanding of all peoples. Christian humility should play some role in this in the hearts of all people attempting to follow Christ. It should be understood that a united and re-evangelized European Christendom should be a better neighbor to all other civilizations than is presently the case, not a worse or only equally good neighbor.

There is much in this website (and in particular on this Politics Page, the Special Page, the Map Page, the Terra Page and obviously in the Blog) which is not dealt with in the film:

United European Christendom - Heal the Schism Now

Does this mean that the content of the film and the contents of this website are unrelated, and indeed that some proposed political positions are out of place within a website, the goal of which in the first instance is to offer information about and generally to support a film about Christian unity? But is not a divided Church a weakened Church? Is not a weakened Church disabled, to greater and lesser extents, in its evangelical mission? Have these circumstances not impacted Christian civilizations, including prominently European Christendom? And what remedial measures will now be necessary if disunity's damage is to be undone?

– Foreign Affairs –

There is every reason to hope and believe and it is to be expected that a re-united and re-evangelized European Christendom will be a better neighbor to other civilizations than is presently the case, not a worse or only equally good neighbor.

Please consider which countries and civilizations, though not potential members of United European Christendom at this time, stand in enduring Special Relationships to European Christendom.

As for the rest of the world, it is hubris to hold that United European Christendom as successor to her constituent parts — and yes, the United States of America is especially meant here — can succeed in eliminating tyranny across the globe or that it is virtuous to even try.

While it is not fully worthy of an endeavor of the kind which this website and the film it supports hope to be to dwell upon specific instances of political malfeasance or mismanagement within one or several of the member countries of United European Christendom, still less to criticize individual transient political actors, even if they be heads-of-state, an exception exists here. United European Christendom is about the civilizational integrity of a vast and decisively important part of Christendom. It is not about imperialism or world government. (Indeed it should be more about federalism and subsidiarity and the return of responsibilities to families.) For one civilization to attempt to position itself as a world police force is not only unworkable, it is unworthy. Enterprises to topple dictators and build democracy for the Muslim Brotherhood and the like would be bad ideas even if they were not exorbitantly costly and doomed to failure.

After the 77-year-long — 1914 to 1991 — Civil War of European Christendom, the Neo-Conservative-Jew war party refused to allow peace to break out. War and war preparations were and are just too damn profitable, and only the sons of the Goyim die. It was not so much as a very few years, rather only months before their sub-mediocre shill, George H.W. Bush, and his Neo-Con intellectual betters developed a new war front for Pax Americana in the form of our unfathomably idiotic intervention into the Kuwatii-Iraqi conflict. In fact it made zero difference to the security or prosperity of the United States of America, or the rate or price at which oil would flow, whether Baathist Iraq or some pimp-mentality, Kuwati emirs controlled the southern part of the Rumaila oil fields, or for that matter the entirety of that utterly artificial, 16 May 1916, Kuwaiti creation of Messrs. Mark Sykes (British) and François Georges-Picot (French). A dozen years after 1991 the (in comparative terms) great protector of Christians, Saddam Hussein, was out of power, replaced by CIA-NSA-DIA –engendered, terrorist-nuturing, perpetual chaos, in the land of Abraham, from thence metastasizing into Syria, Egypt and Libya and onward ...

Recall, before his speechwriting editors had their way, in 1960/61 outgoing president Dwight David Eisenhower had warned the American people of the Congressional-Military-Industrial-Complex.

If American Congressman Ron Paul's oft repeated figures are to be accepted as correct, that the United States lead wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost the United States (as of this first quarter 2012 writing) on the order of US$ 4 trillion, this would work out to somewhat more than US$ 1,300,000,000 for each of the 2977 victims of the Muslim attacks which occurred on 11 September 2001. Moreover, according to the US Department of Defense there were 4,408 total US service personnel deaths through 13 February 2012 as a result of Operation Iraqi Freedom. As Operation New Dawn, initiated on 1September 2010, continues, US deaths continue. Deaths among coalition forces, especially British, raise these numbers higher, and serious injuries raise the casualty numbers multiple times higher. Casualty figures for the Afghan portion of Operation Enduring Freedom as of early 2012 include nearly 2000 US dead and another 1000 dead among other coalition forces, with the British again suffering the second greatest coalition losses. So to summarize, rather than a United States president or other head of state or government within European Christendom standing up and speaking the truth:

-that these attacks occurred because we have so foolhardily allowed an invasion of tens-of-millions of Muslims through immigration into the constituent lands of European Christendom, giving them access, giving them the ability to attack us (and Congressman Paul conspicuously misses this fact);

-that we can expect many more such attacks as the years and decades unfold, with nuclear attacks not unlikely, unless these people, in an orderly and gradual and civilized way, are politely encouraged to repatriate to Muslim lands; and

-that in turn we should exit their territories, including in the first instance dismantling all US military installations in and around their "holy" Arabian Peninsula.

Rather than such a truth-based course of action, "vengeance" was exacted by starting a series of wars which cost us more than 2 dead for every one we were trying to avenge plus in excess of one billion, three hundred million dollars spent to avenge every life lost on 11 September 2001. Who is laughing at whom? With leadership like this European Christendom will not survive. The Muslim States of America and the Islamic European Union will be our legacy.

This type of American imperialism is as damaging to our survival prospects as the Soviet variety was a century ago, but then again Descendants of European Christendom are as little at the vanguard of the American "Neo-conservative" movement as they were at the vanguard of Bolshevism.

It is surely a bitter pill and a great injustice for some of the bravest and most worthy of our people, those serving in the armed forces and intelligence services, to have to swallow, the realization that they have suffered and sacrificed, and that comrades have died, in an unworthy cause. On the other hand it should be these, our wizened warriors, who have the strongest of motivations to struggle for the achievement and consolidation of United European Christendom. Only in this way can worthy efforts be crowned with success in achieving a worthy goal.

– China: relationship with European Christendom, how to respond to their centrally-planned, mercantilist model; our loss of family wage-paying jobs and associated transfer to them of major portions of our manufacturing capacity; their transfer to us of very inexpensive consumer goods; their buying US$ (and selling their Renminbi) in order to keep their currency from appreciating against the US$ (being trashed by the US FED) or the Euro in order that their export-driven mercantilist model might be sustained; their rekindled ethno-nationalism, but also the circumstance that they may now have more Christians, and more real Christians than any other nation-state, massively repressed by that state, all this requires major re-thinking ... or the beginning of thinking.

And Nota Bene, China is the raison d'être and enabler of the mass murderous regime of North Korea. Without China, the seven-decades' North Korean nightmare would have ended scarcely before it even began. Every family GULAG'ed for having a Bible, for not crying sincerely enough for 100 days at the news of the death of Dear Leader Kim Jong-il, or for just being human, every child starved to death, every US Dollar and South Korean Won and Japanese Yen spent to counter this threat, the whole damnable mess is for the account of the Chinese regime. Try though the New York Stock Exchange members and participants will, Let this not be forgotten for a thousand years.

Later, perhaps we can explore the notion of "Face" and "Saving face" in China – the cornerstone of Chinese interpersonal relationships, business culture and culture in general – and the essential identity of Face with Pride — The Great Sin — the exhorbitantly exaggerated pride of image obsession divorced utterly from any actual integrity.

Likewise, no study or synopsis of the status of and prospects for the Christianization of China could be complete without a survey of historical and currrent – second decade of the XXI Century – governmental practices of murdering Christians en masse, not missing that particularly diabolical practice of imprisoning Christians (like Falun Gong, meditation practitioners) until their organs are needed for that booming Chinese industry of organ transplantation, great preference being given by physicians and recipients to organs coming from live donors.

– Sub-Saharan Africa: relationship with European Christendom is a disaster of long standing, and of recent creation.

– Francisco de Jasso y Azpilicueta – Saint Francis Xavier, S.J. (* 7 April 1506 – 3 December 1552 †), arrived in and began his missionary work in Japan in 1547. A half century later — when 26 mártires de Japón – 日本二十六聖人 – Twenty-Six Martyrs of Japan, were crucified for The Faith in Nagasaki on 5 February 1597 on the orders of the feudal warlord, the Daimyō, 豊臣 秀吉 Toyotomi Hideyoshi — there were 200,000 to 300,000 Catholic Christians in Japan.

– The Muslim world: relationhip with European Christendom should be kept as nearly as possible to the non-existent, and certainly zero immigration of Muslims to European Christendom.

On the other hand, the once Christian countries of the Muslim world — Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, "Iraq", "Turkey" and others — are still Muslim, have not abandoned Muhammad's invented "revelation," his "Recitation" and obvious self-serving and self-agrandizing distortions, because we —Orthodox, Catholic and Non-Chalcedonian Orthodox — have failed to sort out under God, our thousand-year-old and our sixteen-hundred-year-old problems, and in so doing we have denied the Muslims a clear path to return to God. That Islam even still exists is our fault. (As an aside, of vastly lower level importance, large percentages of the populations of the just listed countries, indeed in somewhat varying admixtures nearly the entire populations of these countries, are Decendants of European Christendom.)

– Iran. Nuclear weapons proliferation can indeed become a global nightmare in a hurry, but we would all do well to remind ourselves early and often that (i) the very rich Persian culture is of an ancient dignity, and (ii) these people would be a glorious addition to Christendom, and (iii) the combined forces of the Jewish State of Israel and the Jew Neo-Con dominated Republican Party of the United States of American can certainly not be trusted to safeguard the interests of Church or of Christendom.

– Syria. Not perfect, Russia's President Vladimir Putin is a defender of the Christian peoples in the Middle East and in once-Christian northern Africa. The political leadership of the United States of American is treating Christians as enemies. The political leadership and security services of The United States of America are responsible for the current Syrian crisis.

Executive Summary: Moot

There should be no strategic or military alliance of the rest of European Christendom against our brothers of Orthodox-Christian Russia. We are not speaking of the murderous atheist Bolsheviks. Very much the contrary, if any such alliance is needed at all, it must include Russia as an equal and indeed prominent member. In such a case, all assets and personnel of the armed services, security and intelligence services of all constituent countries of United European Christendom, including, without limitation, those of the United States of America, Russia, Germany, Italy, Poland, the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Argentina and Australia should be transferred to the unified, joint command of United European Christendom, and they should be dramatically reduced, the money and manpower and brainpower at last going to the productive activities from which they were so exorbitantly diverted by the XX century's thirty-one-year-long Civil War of European Christendom, 1914 - 1945, then followed by still more totalitarianism, militarism and the triumphal reign of mediocre minds. Neither the so-called "Liberals" nor the Neo-Conservatives, the Neo-Cons, who are not conserving much of value — both movements, both sides of the American political Plutarchy, being intellectually and financially lead by atheist and Talmudic Jews — will like these prescriptions. Get used to it. Veritas-phobia is not Christian.

An important early step, and one long overdue, in winding down and winding up NATO should be the expulsion of the Turks, of Turkey. When the resident citizens of Turkey become Christians, for example when ninety percent of them have embraced Christ Jesus as God and Savior and demonstrated their sincerity over four generations, this question can be revisited. (OK, maybe this criteria can, in time, be relaxed, but the point is made.) For the present, it is an abomination that the United States-led NATO would have a military alliance with any Muslim country against Orthodox-Christian Russia. And even from a secular atheist perspective, it is a really, really stupid thing to do. Turkey no more belongs in a political or military alliance with America or Europe than does Turkmenistan. In fact, it is Russia (and Belarus and the Ukraine) which should be the closest of allies with the other, brother countries of European Christendom. Perhaps the citizens, the members and the owners, of European Christendom will succeed in clearing thier heads of the demonaic doctines of Cultural Marxism in time. In late 2015, with, for example, the United States of America siding with Turkey against Russia, in the shooting down of Russian planes, and with the German leadership – ! under the "Christian" Democrats CDU/CSU (in fact, clueless, visionless atheists) ! – approving and encouraging a new wave of Muslim mass immigration in the millions, and so demographic replacement of lapsed, and non-child-bearing Christians, the outlook obviously does not look promising. But with God all things are possible ... including of course the mass, civilizational-level devastation which we in European Christendom (really dis-United half-European post-Christendom) have called down upon our corporate self through our evil and stupidity and which we so richly deserve.

Originally intended for the holy and fully justified cause of taking back Jerusalem from the Muslims who murderously stole the holiest city on Earth, in the Fourth Crusade the attacking Catholic powers — the Republic of Venice, the Holy Roman Empire, the Kingdom of France — actually destroyed the Byzantine Christian armies and Sacked Orthodox-Christian Constantinople from 8 - 13 April 1204. The Eastern Roman Christian Empire never recovered from this cataclysmic event, and Byzantium, Asia Minor, the Balkan lands and Greece fell to the Muslim Turks in the 15th Century, Constantinople itself succumbing on 29 May 1453.

After the disastrous Mongol invasion of Rus in 1237, and following hard upon their shameful actions further south scarcely more than a generation earlier, in 1240 the "Big C" Catholic Christians, the "Latins" — this time the Swedes and the Livonian-German Teutonic Knights — again struck those they should have considered brothers, the Orthodox Russians of Pskov and Novgorod. Happily, this time, the invading Catholic "Christians" lost, during a dramatic battle on 5 April 1242.

Not to present an unbalanced account, the Russians have done countless bad things to the Poles, the Germans and other Catholic Christians, and those atrocities involved massively larger numbers of victims and they were a whole lot more recent than 1240. Still, we Catholic Christians (there were no Protestants in those days, obviously) did, in a very real way ... "start it".

It is now time for Catholics and Orthodox to resolve their differences and move forward together, or European Christendom will cease to exist ... in the coming decades, not centuries.

Christians fighting Christians, while the Devil laughs.

Remind you of anything which NATO might have involved itself in in 1999?

The panel is from a monument on Alexander Nevsky Square in Saint Petersburg, honoring Saint Alexander Yaroslavich "Nevsky" - Александр Ярославич Невский (1220 - 1263), Prince of Novgorod and Grand Prince of Vladimir.

... detail from another monument glorifying European Christian infighting, this one in Cordoba in Argentina

There has arisen among America's elite a Churchill cult. Its acolytes hold that Churchill was not only a peerless war leader but a statesman of unparalleled vision whose life and legend should be the model for every stateman. To this cult, defiance anywhere of U.S. hegemony, resistance anywhere to U.S. power becomes another 1938. Every adversary is "a new Hitler," every proposal to avert war "another Munich." Slobodan Milosevic, a party apparatchik who had presided over the disintegration of Yugoslavia — losing Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, and Bosnia — becomes "the Hitler of the Balkans" for holding Serbia's cradle province of Kosovo. Saddam Hussein, whose army was routed in one hundred hours in 1991 and who had not shot down a U.S. plane in forty thousand sorties, becomes "an Arab Hitler" about to roll up the Persian Gulf and threaten mankind with weapons of mass destruction.

This mind-set led us to launch a seventy-eight day bombing campaign on Serbia, a nation that never attacked us, never threatened us, never wanted war with us, whose people had always befriended us. After 9/11, the Churchill cult helped to persuade an untutored president that the liberation of Iraq from Saddam would be like the liberation of Europe from Hitler. We would be greeted in Baghdad as our fathers and grandfathers had been in Paris. In the triumphant aftermath of a "cake-walk" war, democracy would put down roots in the Middle East as it had in Europe after the fall of Hitler, and George W. Bush would enter history as the Churchill of his generation, while the timid souls who opposed his war of liberation would be exposed as craven appeasers.

This Churchill cult gave us our present calamity. If not exposed, it will produce more wars and more disasters, and, one day, a war of the magnitude of Churchill's wars that brought Britain and his beloved empire to ruin. For it was Winston S. Churchill who was the most bellicose champion of British entry into the European war of 1914 and the German-Polish war of 1939. There are two great myths about these wars. The first is that World War I was fought "to make the world safe for democracy." The second is that World War II was the "Good War," a glorious crusade to ride the world of Fascism that turned out wonderfully well.

L'ossuaire de Douaumont - within the Verdun battlefield

... Et nous pouvons rendre hommage à ces hommes par la construction d'un Royaume chrétienté européenne. Nationalisme idiot, par la plus forte de contrastes, a créé ce cataclysme.
Chrétienté Européenne Unie ne signifie pas un gouvernement mondial. Cela signifie intégrité civilisationnelle.

... and we can honour these men by building a United European Christendom.

Idiotic nationalism, by the sharpest of contrasts, created this cataclysm.

United European Christendom does NOT mean world government. It means civilizational integrity, informed by Christianity.

Königsberg in fratricidal ruins, with the tower of the Königsberger Dom –
Königsberg Cathedral – Кафедральный собор Кёнигсберга visible to the left.

– Visa requirements or travel restrictions for Member-Citizens of UEC –

Executive Summary: None

There should be completely free movement of the members, the citizens, of United European Christendom with the constituent territories of the civilization of United European Christendom, as has long been the general case within the borders and boundaries of individual countries. Travel should in no way be restricted. Neither should it be subsidized (by the taxpayer). Visas will not be required. In fact, passports will not even be required for travel by the members of United European Christendom within UEC. For those wishing to travel outside of United European Christendom, biometric identification (face, profile and both palms) will be used by UEC border police, and a passport book will be issued in order that the traveler be able to comply with the requirements of foreign governments. Note significantly, that both President Dimitry Medvedev and former President Vladimir Putin have repeatedly offered reciprocal visa-free travel to both the United States of America and the European Union. Can this be made any clearer? A Pole, an Austrialian, an Argentinian coming to the United States of America or to Russia or to Canada to reside permanently is not an immigrant. Such person is merely moving from one part of United European Christendom to another part. There should be no restrictions of any kind on this. Neither should it be subsidized, by the taxpayers of the sending or the receiving constituent province-territory of United European Christendom.

"Thus I shall act to all whom I meet, both young and old, stranger and citizen, but rather to you, my fellow citizens, because ye are more nearly allied to me. For be well assured, this the diety commands."

– Immigration into United European Christendom –

Executive Summary: None

Does the Biblical injunction to "welcome the stranger" mean that European Christendom is to welcome invasion, the demographic replacement which is attendant to mass immigration into European Christiandom of, now many tens of millions and soon hundreds of millions of, people who are not the Descendants of European Christendom?

No additional immigration into any territory of United European Christendom will be permitted. The members of other civilizations should be allowed the dignity of independently developing their own courses, of making their own way, of developing their own civilizations. The circumstance of the peoples of other civilizations being allowed by non-representative government officials to immigrate to UEC, while being partially half-welcome within the many societies of United European Christendom, has and will continue to produce poor results. And from the perspective of the sending societies, it is obviously not in their interests to lose their most energetic, educated and entrepreneurial individuals. This obviously impoverishes them, often with tragic results. Therefore the groups within UEC which have advocated and continue to advocate for such immigration obviously have other agendas than helping these sending communities and countries.

– Amnesty or Citizenship for illegal/undocumented immigrants already within any of the territories of United European Christendom –

Executive Summary: None

Illegal/undocumented immigrants already within any of the territories of United European Christendom will never be eligible for citizenship of United European Christendom, nor will any children (anchor babies) born to them. In a civilized, dignified, orderly and gradual way these illegal immigrants should be encouraged to return to their own countries. Official racial profiling in order to identify such people is entirely appropriate and necessary, the least restrictive alternative advancing a compelling state interest.

– Turkish membership in the European Union or in United European Christendom –

Executive Summary: Of course not.

Still, it speaks volumes that this could even have been seriously discussed over these past many years. This circumstance well illustrates how far so many members and especially political leaders within (presently dis-United) European Christendom have fallen. Audi-man is illustrative. Because Turks within UEC constituent countries nearly invariably vote for candidates from those countries' "liberal" political parties — most prominently the SPD within Germany — these "leaders" would sell thousands of years of civilizational accomplishments and our Christian integrity, or what little of it remains, in exchange for their own transitory political advantage! On 12 September 1683 the Polish forces under Jan III Sobieski managed at the walls of Vienna to turn the tide of Turkish invasion and the Muslim subjugation of European Christendom. Now we will allow demographic replacement through EU membership – and all that comes with it – to achieve that which the Muslims could not accomplish through war against us?

Executive Summary: Irrelevant ... well, partly.

Referring to the European Union, Conquest writes: "If we seek something better, it seems sensible to turn to a grouping wich would be natural rather than artificial, going with the cultural grain rather than cutting across it. It hardly needs saying that what comes to mind is some form of unity between the countries of the same legal and political tradition: that is to say an Association of the United States of America, the United Kingdom and Canada, with Australia and New Zealand and, it is to be hoped, Ireland, the nations of the Caribbean and the Pacific Ocean, perhaps others. Such an international grouping could in the long run lead to a world order, and in the short run be a valid entity. ... What I am thus putting forward a flexibly conceived Association of the countries of the same language, legal tradition and general political culture, as the national way in which the greater unity can develop: a unity that matches our history and feelings, and is not an artificial cutting across them."

Perhaps the present writer is misunderstanding Conquest. This is to be hoped. Is he actually suggesting that of paramount importance is the judge-made-law, common law legal systems of Anglo-American jurisprudence, in contradistinction to, opposed to, the Legal Code based jurisprudence more common on the Continent? How exactly is the United Kingdom more free than France or Germany or Sweden or Luxembourg? True, Conquest was finishing writing these words in 2000 and not in 2014, but even from that perch, is Conquest blind to the abismal fertility rates of the English and Scots and Canadians and New Zealanders? He has failed to notice that, on the road to demographic replacement and the death through suicide of a civilization pervading almost all of European Christendom, his own United Kingdom has a special (inverted) pride of place? And he believes that the Africans of Jamaica and Haiti and the money-worshiping Asians in Hong Kong and elsewhere in his "Pacific Ocean / Australasia" have more natural, less artificial cultural connections with the (native) English-speaking part of European Christendom than does that English-speaking part of European Christendom with the rest of Christendom? Haiti and Jamaica and Hong Kong have more, and more of importance, in common with Scotland and the United States than Scotland and the United States have in common with Poland and Germany and Italy? And a man of this profound learning also forgets the role that the Catholic monasteries of Ireland had in reintroducing civilization to his own native England after the barbarian invasions had nearly squashed the Christian civilization of the Roman Empire in England from centuries earlier?

p. 271 "The English-speaking countries have diverged, but not too much. It is true that, even within our tradition, in many parts of the world there is lost ground to be made up. Since the establishment of the EEC, for example, in both Australia and New Zealand we have not seen only an disruption in economic links formerly existing between them and Britain, but a concurrent political alienation, though not yet to the point of resentment on the decisive scale."

p. 273 "No one who knows the English, Scots and Welsh could believe for a moment that they are really much the same. The cultural, tempermental and other differences are very great indeed. But the political and civic traditions, the elements of unity, trandscend them." Conquest is distorted. God means less to him than ... than ... actually, what does he value so highly? A parliamentary system of representative democracy over a presidential system of representative democracy? But the United States of America, which in population would make up two-thirds of his English-speaking, European Union-supplanting Association, has a presidential system. What are these civic traditions of England and her former colonies which are so ingrained and so superior to those in the rest of European Christendom? One might in this connection, by way of example, do well to consider the writings of Conquest's fellow Britian and Oxford Professor, Norman Davies. Davies reminds us that, though possessing roots centuries deeper still, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth created by the Union of Lublin in 1569 -- the Most Serene Republic of Poland, in the Latin of the day, the Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae, officially named:

-in Polish: Królestwo Polskie i Wielkie Księstwo Litewskie;
-in Lithuanian: Lenkijos Karalystė ir Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė;
-in Ukrainian: Королівство Польське та Вели́ке князі́вство Лито́вське;
-in Belarusian: Каралеўства Польскае і Вялікае Княства Літоўскае

-- one of the largest and most populous countries of 16th- and 17th-Century Europe, though no modern democracy in the sense that all adult inhabitants participated, still in percentage terms the franchise, the right to participant in the democratic process, extended in Poland-Lithuania to two percent of the population. This contrasted with the situtation in the Kingdom of England where only half that proportion, only one percent of the population, could participate in English democracy Conquest seems to so venerate. Wherein the Anglo superiority? And now in the 21st Century, in what ways is the United Kingdom (GDP per capita about 39,000 US$) superior to Austria (GDP per capita 46,000 US$ and much more evenly distributed) in Liberty and Law and Life chances? Or maybe the superiority, the Anglo arrogance, subsists in the United Kingdom's greater number of Pakistani and Arab Muslims screaming to tear that society to shreds or in the fact that the Homosexual "Marriage" law in England and Wales was given Royal Assent on 17 July 2013 by Queen Elizabeth II, "By the Grace of God ... Defender of the Faith"!

Executive Summaries:

– Restrictions on the movement of Goods, Services and Capital within UEC–

Executive Summary: None

And regulatory and especially taxation policies within and among the constituent countries of UEC should be harmonized to the maximum extent practicable.

Reference here is particularly made to the political leaders and elite of the United States of America, who are usually enemies of Church, Christendom and Christendom's working and creative peoples, but even when not those things, they are too stupid and intellectually distorted to grasp to what extent their policies have led to the destruction of American manufacturing capacity, family wage paying jobs and the dignity of working people.

Movement of goods, services, capital and labor within the economies of European Christendom are an entirely different matter, for here, as with immigration, there is movement in both directions between the member nationstates of European Christendom, and a balance, an equilibrium, a homeostasis if one will, among us all. There will be annual ebbs and flows in balances of trade and payments between any two of them, but any disadvantages flowing from such are much more than offset by advantages, advantages to the working and creative peoples of European Christendom as a whole.

Here one speaks not advantages to the banking and plutocrat classes, the lawyers and accountants which support them, etc., the exclusive net beneficiaries with that very different, those diametrically opposite and opposed groups of phenomena which are of inter-civilizational "free trade". Which brings us to our next topic heading, if European Christendom is to endure as a civilization, our peoples to survive:

– Restrictions on the Import of Goods and Services produced outside UEC into UEC and restrictions on the movement of capital from UEC out of UEC –

Executive Summary: Yes, absolutely needed.

 

Case Study in the destruction of our manufacturing base, family wage paying jobs, and the dignity of our working families
(And these factories and jobs did not move to other locations within European Christendom.)
United States — China Trade Balances, and this means Trade Deficits, year after year, decade after decade.
(Though in 1980 the United States had a small, 2.7 US$ Trade Surplus with China,
but then came Slick Willy and the Shrubbery, followed by a Teleprompter-Reader-in-Chief.)
1990					2015
USA exports to China:	US$ 4.8 billion				USA exports to China:	US$ 116.2 billion
USA imports from China:	US$ 15.2 billion				USA imports from China:	US$ 481.9 billion
USA trade deficit with China:	US$ 10.4 billion				USA trade deficit with China:	US$ 365.7 billion

 

This topic requires a serious and intensive civilization-wide debate if we are going to avoid losing this grand civilizational struggle — and with it our civilization — because various of our own members are still fighting socio-economic class struggles. WTO and NAFTA. On 8 December 1993 that great populist, President William Jefferson Clinton, who cares oh so much about the working man, signed the North American Free Trade Agreement into law, to the joy of the other enemy of European Christendom in United States politics: the controlling NeoCon-Corporate wing of the Republican Party. (Read the extensive list of Who-is-Who in American Jewry which brought into existence this abomination against working men and women..)

— Go elsewhere if you seek presentations of partial-truth positions, partial truthfulness, the hallmark of heretics and of the controlled opposition. —

These present comments are a place holder, and we will save for another day a discussion of the implications for European Christendom of national economies which are:

• Consumption oriented;
• Import-based, with huge balance of trade deficits, year after year, then decade after decade, with the associated ...
• Loss of Manufacturing capacity within European Christendom, and, with such loss of manufacturing capacity, that is, factories, the ...
• Loss of family-wage-paying jobs by the millions, then tens of millions;
• The proliferation of low-paying private service sector jobs within European Christendom; as also ...
• Extreme increase of the percentage of the one-time workforce now employeed by the Government itself at all levels: national-federal; state-provincial; local-county-municipal;
• A monetary system and monetary policies — basically debt-based, and interest-bearing currency emission by national (e.g., the United States Federal Reserve System, the "Fed") or multi-national (e.g., the European Central Bank) central banks, followed by fractional reserve lending by commercial banks — which combine to produce an inexorable march of inflation, in effect a hidden tax, through the insidious erosion of the real value of these already much reduced wages of our workers, of us. And while it is true that this inflation-cum-hidden tax reduces the value of everyone's money, the wealthiest families in society much more than make up for this through the advantages that accrue to them through (i) "Free Trade" (through the much increased profits of the corporations which they own and control stemming from production having been transplated into much lower wage and cost countries (i.e., everywhere other than European Christendom); (ii) the much increased billable rates and fees and profitability of the Money Industries, those companies and individuals which make the manufacturing base transplantation happen, that is, the bankers and brokers and lawyers and accountants and consultants; (iii) employment with and ownership interests in the financial sector industries, again banks and funds and brokerages and investment houses, who are the only ones who can profit from the financing schemes and machinations of the central banker–plutocratic–industrial complex. By way of glaring example of this latter, consider the Fed's many-years-running racket of quantitative easing/zero interest rates, zero interest rates combined with a promise to the finance industry gamblers that they, the Fed, will give them, the bankster-gamblers many months' advanced notice before raising interest rates. One can find this scheme described in detail elsewhere, but in brief this scheme of Greenspan-Bernanke-Yellen (! guess !) entails (a) a multi-trillion US$, that is trillion with a T, reverse-robin-hood wealth transfer from a massive group of middle-income savers (? who are these people predominantly in terms of religious self-identification ?) who have been paid nothing on their savings for most of a decade while inflation erodes the value of their principal, leaving them with a negative real rate of return; (b) to those inside the finance industry establishment (? who are these people in great disproportion in terms of religious self-identification ?) who are the ones, and the only ones, who can take advantage of the cheap, actually free, credit provided by the Fed in order to finance their asset purchase gambles on credit and with little to no risks to themselves; (c) the United States government can and has run up much increased annual budget deficits, pushing the national debt, as of this late 2015 writing, to nearly 20 Trillion US$, a stratospheric number, already higher than the US GDP and growing rapidly, which figure does not however include total unfunded federal government liabilities. (Think of the distinction this way. National Debt is what is owed under contractual-type undertakings to pay. Other unfunded liabilites are what is owed under statutory undertakings to pay.) The figure for total unfunded liabilites, money/wealth/assets/property that citizens and residents of America have been promised and are counting on to live, but which does not exist yet, is not 20 Trillion US$. It is 100 Trillion US$. And recall, one speaks here only of the United States, true the most populous single member state, but still only about 25 percent of European Christendom. Most of the rest of our people have been worked into similarly precarious positions by their incompetent, and/or nefariously motivated, national government and central bank leaders. But in the case of the USA, and quite unlike the rest of European Christendom, the swelling national debt (and a large share of the unfunded liabilites), have come about in no small part because of elective foreign military ventures. The cost of these misadventures — unseating mildly tyrannical governments within the Muslim world, which were however by comparison protective of Christian minorities within those countries, and seeing these come to be replaced with far more militant and murderous Muslim warlords — did not have to be paid for with taxation. Instead the costs were concealed, as the money was borrowed, and at extremely low interest. And the money was not even borrowed directly from the Fed. Instead the US Treasury issues its debt instruments, its bills and notes and bonds; these instruments are bought by the likes of Goldman Sachs and the rest of the banksters; and then the Fed buys them from these bastards, at higher prices of course. So in effect, we have a system that allows bankster-bastards to front run the United States of America's Central Bank, the Fed, in the purchase of the debt securities issued by the United States Government (through its Department of the Treasury), and the people pick up the tab in terms of taxes paid, yes, but also in the form of the hidden tax which is inflation. And how richly we in European Christendom deserved to be duped, because we let it happen.

Could any board of demonaic directors have designed a system more far and away the antithesis of a Christian economic system? But, as stated, let us leave further commentary on all of this for another day.

Mary Sylvester painted by Joseph Blackburn (1754),
dressing like a shepherdess, "a coy way of inverting social status,"
reminiscent of the behavior of the daughters (worse still, sons) of the law
and accounting firm partners, bankers, brokers and screen actors of our own time.

Forging the Shaft (or getting the shaft, 1874-77)
John Ferguson Weir (1841-1926) in the Metropolitan Museum of Art

The quest to drive down wages is utterly antithetical to the quest for a prosperous country or even the survival of a people and such people's civilization. A just wage is a wage which enables the worker to support a family in dignity, as he could previously through the application of his own labor to his own productive property, his farm or workshop or business.

If by capitalism is meant, not diffused ownership of property, but monopolistic capitalism in which capital bids for labor on a market, and concentrates wealth in the hands of the few then from an economic point of view alone, the Church is just as much opposed to capitalism as it is to communism. Communism emphasizes social use to the exclusion of personal rights, and capitalism emphasizes personal rights to the exclusion of social use. The Church says both are wrong, for though the right to property is personal, the use is social. It therefore refuses to maintain capitalism as an alternative to the economic side of communism. Monopolistic capitalism concentrates wealth in the hands of a few capitalists, and communism in the hands of a few bureaucrats, and both end in the proletarianization of the masses. The true Christian must rid himself of the delusion that in opposing communism the Church thereby puts itself in opposition to all those who would seek thus to change the present economic system. The Christian concept denies there is an absolutely owned private property exclusive of limits set by the common good of the community and responsibility to the community. The more anonymous and impersonalistc property becomes, the less is the right to it. The Church agrees with communism in its protest against the injustice of the economic order, but it parts with it in the collectivity being made the sole employer, for this reduces the individual to the status of a serf or a slave of the state. Concentration of wealth is wrong whether it is done on the Hudson or on the Volga.

The Church is not opposed to communism because the Church is a defender of the status quo. In every movement one must distinguish between protests and reforms. One can protest against a headache without advocating decapitation. The protests of communism are often right; but the reforms are wrong. The Church agrees with some of the protests of communism. In fact, there is a far better critique of the existing economic order based on the primacy of profit in two encyclicals of Leo XIII and Pius XI than in all the writings of Marx. But the reforms of communism are wrong, because they are inspired by the very erros they combat. Communism begins with the liberal and capitalistic error that man is economic, and, instead of correcting it, merely intensifies it until man becomes a robot in a vast economic machine. There is a closer relationship between communism and monopolistic capitalism than most minds suspect. They are agreed on the materialistic basis of civilization; they disagree only on who shall control that basis, capitalists or bureaucrates. Marx himself admitted he got many of his economic ideas from liberal economists such as Ricardo and the author of an anonymous work on interest. Capitalistic economy is godless; communism makes economics God. It is Divinity itself. Capitalism denies that economics is subject to a higher moral order. Communism says that economics is morality. Communism is not a radical solution of our economic problem; however violent be its approach, it does not touch the roots of the evil ...

Those who look to the Church in this hour of peril to pluck out of the fire the chestnuts of liberalism, secularism, materialism, and monopolistic capitalism are doomed to disappointment… It is so easy for those who have made their money under a given system to think that that system must be right and good. Conservatism is for that reason often nothing else than a pseudo philosophy for the prosperous. The Church, however, knows that the disorganization of the world is largely due to the fact that it is not organized by any conscious acceptance of purpose other than the immediate interest of a capitalist class on the one hand, or a Communist class on the other hand. That is why the economic policy of the Church is constantly in opposition to both capitalism and communism.

Looking at the factory buildings and the barracks, where the workpeople were asleep, he thought again what he always thought when he saw a factory. They may have performances for the workpeople, magic lanterns, factory doctors, and improvements of all sorts, but, all the same, the workpeople he had met that day on his way from the station did not look in any way different from those he had known long ago in his childhood, before there were factory performances and improvements. As a doctor accustomed to judging correctly of chronic complaints, the radical cause of which was incomprehensible and incurable, he looked upon factories as something baffling, the cause of which also was obscure and not removable, and all the improvements in the life of the factory hands he looked upon not as superfluous, but as comparable with the treatment of incurable illnesses.

"There is something baffling in it, of course ..." he thought, looking at the crimson windows. "Fifteen hundred or two thousand workpeople are working without rest in unhealthy surroundings, making bad cotton goods, living on the verge of starvation, and only waking from this nightmare at rare intervals in the tavern; a hundred people act as overseers, and the whole life of that hundred is spent in imposing fines, in abuse, in injustice, and only two or three so-called owners enjoy the profits, though they don't work at all, and despise the wretched cotton. But what are the profits, and how do they enjoy them? Madame Lyalikov and her daughter are unhappy—it makes one wretched to look at them; the only one who enjoys her life is Christina Dmitryevna, a stupid, middle-aged maiden lady in pince-nez. And so it appears that all these five blocks of buildings are at work, and inferior cotton is sold in the Eastern markets, simply that Christina Dmitryevna may eat sterlet and drink Madeira."

– Public Assistance transfer payments - "welfare"- and aid to other countries –

Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany, where Lazarus was, whom Jesus had raised from the dead. There they made him a supper; Martha served, and Lazarus was one of those at table with him. Mary took a pound of costly ointment of pure nard and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped his feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the ointment. But Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (he who was to betray him), said, “Why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?” This he said, not that he cared for the poor but because he was a thief, and as he had the money box he used to take what was put into it. Jesus said, Let her alone, let her keep it for the day of my burial. The poor you always have with you, but you do not always have me.

The sowing of confusion and the reaping of resentments that are the offspring of confusion:

How many people have gone hungry and unaided, what an enormous and abiding disservice has been done to the poor, by the obstinate insistence of Catholic clergy to conflate justice with grace and mercy?

What a different result would there be if instead these priests taught that we should be giving more than justice, in part because we want to receive more than justice from Our Father in Heaven and more so still because we love God and want to please Him, even be like Him?

Why did these Catholics not understand this, en masse and over many decades at least?

2 Thessalonians 3:6-10

Proverbs 21:13

peccata clamantia – The four sins that cry to Heaven for Vengeance

1. Murder. Cain said to Abel his brother, “Let us go out to the field.” And when they were in the field, Cain rose up against his brother Abel, and killed him. Then the Lord said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” He said, “I do not know; am I my brother’s keeper?” And the Lord said, “What have you done? The voice of your brother’s blood is crying to me from the ground. ..."
   — Genesis 4:8-10 —
2. Sodomy. The two angels came to Sodom in the evening; and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, he rose to meet them, and bowed himself with his face to the earth, and said, “My lords, turn aside, I pray you, to your servant’s house and spend the night, and wash your feet; then you may rise up early and go on your way.” They said, “No; we will spend the night in the street.” But he urged them strongly; so they turned aside to him and entered his house; and he made them a feast, and baked unleavened bread, and they ate. But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house; and they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.” Lot went out of the door to the men, shut the door after him, and said, “I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly.
   — Genesis 19:1-7 —
   You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.
   — Leviticus 18:22 —
   If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them.
   — Leviticus 20:13 —
3. Oppression of the Poor. In the course of those many days the king of Egypt died. And the people of Israel groaned under their bondage, and cried out for help, and their cry under bondage came up to God.
   — Exodus 2:23 —
4. Defrauding Workers or Cheating them out of their Just Wages. Behold, the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, cry out; and the cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts.
   — James 5:4 —

caritas - Basilique Notre-Dame de Montréal - Notre-Dame Basilica, Montreal, Canada

– Validity of "Affirmative Action" and "Civil Rights" legislation and related judicial pronouncements –

Executive Summary: None

All policies, procedures and programs designed to or having the effect of discriminating against the Descendants of European Christendom by offering, at the expense of the Descendants of European Christendom, advantage of any kind to any or all people other than the Descendants of European Christendom within the territories of United European Christendom should be permanently repealed. Henceforth they should be illegal. Likewise, that pernicious form of racial-oriented "affirmative" action which is called "Civil Rights" legislation should be permanently repealed. It is utterly void and without effect. (One such example being the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964.) "Prohibited from discriminating against," has come to be another way of phrasing "forced to hire, retain and promote". There is no compelling virtue in transferring ever greater portions of the possession, ownership and control of United European Christendom to everyone other than the Descendants of European Christendom.

Executive Summary: None

Who decides what constitutes hate? Hurtful, true words spoken about identifiable groups, discrete and insular minorities? Obviously the only one ultimately qualified is God - eternally Father, Son and Holy Ghost - though the general magisterium of the Orthodox-Catholic Church usually achieves a good approximation. But the supporters and promulgators of these laws have something different in mind. They have the opposite in mind. They have in mind the aquisition of weapons by the enemies of the Church and of Christendom to be used to silence the faithful of the Church and the soldiers of Christendom. While occasionally, for purposes of display, these laws have been used to prosecuted people other than the Descendants of European Christendom, they were enacted by enemies of European Christendom as a tool to persecute the Descendants of European Christendom within their own civilization, to cower them into the fear of giving utterance to objections to the transfer of ever greater portions of the possession, ownership and control of United European Christendom to everyone other than the Descendants of European Christendom. These laws are unacceptable, and they are invalid.

– Abortion –

Executive Summary: Abomination

Human life is exceptional, and this life begins at the moment of conception. Oriental Orthodox, Orthodox and Catholic doctrine and moral teachings are unanimous on this point, the truth of which must also be obvious to even the most unschooled. The merciful God gave all of us a conscience. The number one cause of human death in the world is the murder by their own mothers and fathers of small, not-yet-born children. If there is a civilizational component to this phenomenon, there is absolutely no virtue in remaining silent or purposely turning a blind eye to this circumstance. This is no less the case if there is an identifiable ethnic or religious or ethno-religious group (enormously disproportionately) at the intellectual or/and financial vanguard of this death culture. Countless career Catholics — people dedicated passionately to the truth in some areas but seemingly phobic to the truth in other areas — make themselves complicit in this mass horror by their silence on this matter. This observation is directed with particular force to those Catholics in positions of power in the Catholic mass media, print and broadcast, people who have, by the Grace of God, a platform that would allow them to reach millions and actually be effective, and to those in positions to influence them. "... From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from the one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded. I came to bring fire to the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled!" Luke 12:48-49.

One is tempted to ask in this matter, are you all blind or just stupid? But actually if these people were stupid that would be exculpating. In fact they are highly intelligent and well informed. Regarding both the legal side and the medical side, do you, career Catholics, actually not understand, are you actually clueless about the identity characteristic of the personnel of the abortion industry, the obstetricians and gynecologists actually performing the infanticide and the lawyers championing this "civil right"? Let me help you all out here. This is not about Margaret Sanger. Who populates, whose agenda motivate, who calls the shots within the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Lawyers Guild, Amnesty International, the Southern Poverty Law Center and hundreds of other abortion advocacy organizations? So do your research, and publicly speak accurately and with integrity about your findings.

And frankly, though this issue gets the just preceding treatment here, this is not a part of the project of United European Christendom. We salute those Christians who passionately make fighting the evil that is abortion the thrust of their mission. It very likely is the most important pastoral issue facing the Church within European Christendom, with perhaps one-hundred million already dead and no end in sight to this abomination. And yet for the very reason that this evil is so obvious under both unvarying and unalterable Church doctrine and under Natural Law, intellectually, this stuff is low-hanging fruit. As with homosexual marriage, celebrating homosexuality and Homosexualism and homosexuality in the priesthood, regarding abortion, the thing itself, there is nothing to talk about. Identify the perpetrators, and then crush the vile thing.

“Ecrasons l'infame!”

God created man in his image; in the divine image he created him; male and female he created them. God blessed them, saying: "Be fertile and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it. Have dominion over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, and all the living things that move on the earth." (NAB)

So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth." (RSV)

"Be fertile, then, and multiply; abound on earth and subdue it." (NAB)

"And you, be fruitful and multiply, bring forth abundantly on the earth and multiply in it." (RSV)

– Homosexuality and Homosexualism –

– Validity of same-sex marriages and the celebration of homosexuality –

Executive Summary: None

– Compatability of homosexuality with service in God's priesthood –

Executive Summary: None (Church leaders might learn something from terse treatment such as this.)

God's holy priesthood is not to be used by disturbed men as their crucible for acting out or working through their disorders, their psycho-sexual disturbances, however sympathetic Christians should be toward the sick.

– Compatability of homosexuality with service in any of the armed forces or the intelligence or security forces of United European Christendom –

Executive Summary: None

– Feminism –

Let us get women into commercial competition with men, and get women also into the armed forces while we are at it, to destroy what little is left of the instinct of men to protect women and children; transfer the care and education of children away from the family and to the state as early as possible, preferably as soon as the little people grow out of being toddlers; control their entire moral and spiritual indoctrination; and as an added bonus now the entire productive activity and output of the other half of humanity can also be subject to statist taxation. What a grand and liberating scheme!

 

Environmentalism – the religion of urban atheists, who, hypocritically, consume a whole lot more than their per capita shares of the natural environment.

And yet we can all harbor some abiding regrets that "conservatives" have not taken this issue away from the "liberals", leaving the latter absolutely bankrupt. Should not conservatives reflect more on what it is that they are conserving? Perhaps a few "case study" examples will give the Descendants of European Christendom some additional food for reflection.

Whales, majestic and highly intelligent, hold a special place in the Animal Kingdom. And even within such illustrious company the blue whale holds particular fascination, very interesting use of sonar, perhaps the largest animal which ever existed, weighing up to 200 tons and still capable of swimming 50 kilometers per hour. Before the beginning of the 20th Century they were rarely hunted (successfully), and there were perhaps a half million individuals world wide, with the largest concentration in the Southern Ocean. When man once developed the technical ability to do so, he proceeded to hunt them to near extinction over a period of 40 years, to the point that there were less than 1 percent of the pre-mass-hunting number left world wide, and in the Antarctic there were perhaps only 0.15 percent of the original number. Even today, 45 years after the 1966 ban on hunting blue whales, there are perhaps fewer than 12,000 world wide. Without this ban, without this interference in the free market, they would have been hunted to extinction. Perhaps some of my fellow conservative Christians would be willing to admit that free and open and unregulated markets do not always and everywhere produce particularly admirable results.

By far the largest and most diverse and important tropical rainforest in the world, located within a seven million square kilometer basin, the Amazon Rainforest covers about 5.5 million square kilometers, about 60 percent of which are located in Brazil. It is being destroyed. Deforested areas are visible to the naked eye from space. The nation-state of Brazil is not going to save it. The current international institutions, the World Bank and the IMF , have made the situation worse. They financed the major access highways that enormously intensified the pace of deforestation. Here is what would be an effective alternative - Special Ecological Preserve - however fanciful it may appear under current circumstances. The united strength, including in the fiancial sense, could make it possible for United European Christendom to pay Brazil and Bolivia (as also Paraguay, although these territories are not currently under rainforest cover, they are very sparsely populated) some annual remittance in exchange for setting these territories aside from all human immigration and economic exploitation as pasture land or clear-cut logging. Let support of this initiative or failure to support it stand as a litmus test. Are "environmentalists" or "environmental activists" actually concerned with preserving the good Earth's natural environment? Or are you only all-purpose, "anti-establishment", pro-UEC destruction "liberals", liberally wasting and squandering and ruining and defiling everything of value which you have inherited?

Romans 8:22-23

– Animal Protection –
Please consider reading Matthew Scully's excellent book:
Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy

[T]hey exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.
– Romans 1:25 –

Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? And not one of them is forgotten before God.
– Luke 12:6–

"Aristocratic origin is as inscrutable as the darkness of the past night. A mighty aristocrat of to-day may be of the meanest soul-stuff, and the beggar at his door of the noblest. But respect both of them equally, knowing that both of them are of the same royal origin. The Most High name both of them His children. For the same reason respect asses and sheep and trees and stones."
– Saint Nilolaj Velimirovic in The Agony of the Church –

Cairo

Climate Change and Global Warming - Are they real and are they anthropogenic, caused or exacerbated by mankind through the burning of fossil fuels?

Executive Summary: It does not matter, because we in UEC should be pursuing energy alternatives with the utmost vigor in either case.

Transferring any additional resources from European Christendom to Dar al-Islam is a very bad thing.

And that is where the easily accessible, and so cheap, oil comes from. So the "liberals" — who in so many other areas struggle for the destruction of the Church and Christendom and especially European Christendom and all that is worthy and good and beautiful — are actually accidentally right on this one, even if for the wrong reasons, though in point of fact they may be right also for the right reason, that climate change is real and is anthropogenic.

– Separation of the Church and the State or Error has no Right –

In many of the lands of United European Christendom, the United States of America in particular, the valid component of this vitally important principle has been grievously distorted, no surprise given who has been relegated to interpreting the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. With integrity, in reality, the vital, legitimate point is that the state may not control the Church, may not subordinate the Church to itself. It is not that the Church and Christianity may not influence the state and inform public discourse. The state has no say whatsoever in the content of the faith, the appointment of bishops and so forth. The Barmen Declaration of 1934, Die Barmer Theologische Erklärung, its value and limitations, are not forgotten. But Christians and the Church that guides and leads them should build a Christian civilization, or die trying, Christian men and women that is. The Church is immortal, is eternal. To touch only a little more on the underlying intellectual and spiritual problem in errant formulations of the valid principle of the separation of the Church and the state, the problem is the divinization of human thinking and any attempt to ally God with human cultures, achievements, or possessions.

Writing in 1917 in The Agony of the Church, Saint Nilolaj Velimirovic stated: "There are three ages in the history of the Church: the Golden Age, when the Church was opposed to political governments; the Iron Age, when she was politically directing Europe's kingdoms; and the Stone Age, when she has been subdued to the service of political governments. What a humiliation for the present generation to live in the Stone Age of Christianity!" He also wrote: "Christianity is neither monarchial nor republican. It does not care about institutions but about the spirit living in them. That institution is the best which is fullest of the Christian spirit. From this point of view, an autocracy may be better than a republic, and vice versa. (emphasis added)"

And to think that one could write such things years before having read, or even heard of, Pope Saint Pius X's 1906 Encyclical, Vehementer Nos.

In Madawaska, Maine, by the Grace of God, Christian teaching is still allowed, though not of course in any public place, as such would be allowed and celebrated in Russia, Serbia or Greece.

How the times they have a'changed.

– Judicial Activism –

Executive Summary: Eliminate

Personnel is policy. Presently more of a problem by far in the United States of America than in other corners of United European Christendom, the disease of judicial activism is making encroachments in these other corners also and with accelerating rapidity. And since circa twenty-five percent of the overall UEC population resides in America, even if the problem were confined there — it is not — a huge problem for UEC it would remain. These activist judges have seized legislative power and appropriated such civilizational forming power to themselves, to advance their own, not only non-Christian, but militantly anti-Christian and anti-Christendom agendas:

• transmogrified notions of justice and interpretations of civil rights;
• inverted law and justice values (treating criminals as victims and victims as criminals: please watch Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen's excellent statement on false compassion from 50 years ago www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUgHRHJRIuo (3 minute highlight) www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXQP3UJnagM, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip7pKqfhWeo et. seq. (24 minute full program));
• prohibiting legislatures from prohibiting abortion because of ludicrous, invented arguments about "emanations" from "penumbras" of Constitutional provisions;
• ludicrous interpretations of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution-- the separation of Church and State was intended to prohibit the government from interfering with the Church, not the Church and Christianity from informing public debate;
• prohibitions on law enforcement agencies and officers effectively enforcing immigration laws; and so on ad nauseum.

They must be stopped by removing them. Except possibly in very small numbers, they will not be won over. The phenomenon is ossified and entrenched in large measure due to the religio-ethnic identity and self-identification of a very large percentage of the total bench and bar, and the agendas that have come to flow from such identity.

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil, who change darkness into light, and light into darkness, who change bitter into sweet, and sweet into bitter! Woe to those who are wise in their own sight, and prudent in their own esteem!"
Isaiah 5:20-21